In the newest issue of
Art Papers, Glenn Kaino's conversation with Lauri Firstenberg answers the question "Do you see the potential for radicality in contemporary art practice?" The middle paragraph to Glenn's answer reads:
"Some people try to adopt radical political positions without having anything at stake. They market themselves by using the romantic veneer of revolutionary acts of the past. This is not that interesting to me. I believe in risk and in the gamble. For me, process is rewarding and dynamic. Winning and losing are static proportions."I'm currently sitting in the
Daniel Bozhkov exhibition in the UNT gallery and I'm thinking about what this particular artist (Daniel) learned with each piece "produced." Today, curiosity for the world is what I see. I'm beginning to become more and more fascinated the process or, rather, processes that an artist goes through in creating his or her work. Can I see it? Do I have to dig through the surface to get to it? How much does time matter in regards to process?